Marxist thesis

Material assemblages (cultures in an archaeological sense) are often equated with past social groups (cultures in a sociological sense). There are many problems with such equations. Cultures are difficult to define, cultural identities overlap, and culture forms are dynamic and changeable. Important social divisions are often obscured by cultural uniformity and, conversely, important connections may cut across cultural differences. A relationship between material assemblages and past social groups is, nonetheless, a reasonable and necessary working hypothesis in archaeological research. Without it, given that archaeology is the study of the past through material remains, we could make very little progress of any kind. But to equate material assemblages with “races” is an altogether different matter.

We urge you to turn off your ad blocker for The Telegraph website so that you can continue to access our quality content in the future.

Free access to 40+ digital editions
Website access
Daily Newsletter

Learn more

marxist thesis

Marxist thesis

Action Action

marxist thesis

Marxist thesis

Action Action

marxist thesis

Marxist thesis

Free access to 40+ digital editions
Website access
Daily Newsletter

Action Action

marxist thesis
Marxist thesis

Action Action

Marxist thesis

Action Action

marxist thesis

Marxist thesis

We urge you to turn off your ad blocker for The Telegraph website so that you can continue to access our quality content in the future.

Action Action

marxist thesis

Marxist thesis

Free access to 40+ digital editions
Website access
Daily Newsletter

Action Action

marxist thesis

Marxist thesis

Action Action

Bootstrap Thumbnail Second

Marxist thesis

Action Action

Bootstrap Thumbnail Third

Marxist thesis

Action Action